BTS's J-Hope And Jang Sung Kyu Exchange Sweet Messages On Instagram
BTS’s J-Hope and Jang Sung Kyu thrilled fans with a friendly interaction on Instagram!
On January 12, Jang Sung Kyu uploaded a screenshot of J-Hope’s Instagram story, which was a screenshot of an episode of Jang Sung Kyu’s YouTube series “Workman.” In that particular scene, Jang Sung Kyu used J-Hope’s name as a pun and wished the idol would appear on his program.
In the caption, Jang Sung Kyu wrote, “I couldn’t believe my eyes. It’s fascinating enough that BTS watches ‘Workman,’ but he even posted it… I think I used up all my luck this year.”
View this post on Instagram
Then Jang Sung Kyu revealed the DMs (direct messages) he exchanged with J-Hope along with the caption, “It’s not easy for someone who touches the world to take care of one person’s emotion… I bet aliens are ARMYs (BTS’s fandom name) too.”
The messages start with J-Hope saying, “Oh, hyungnim!!! Hello!!!!! Hahahaha! This is awesome! I’ve been watching ‘Workman’ ever since a long time ago. Haha. I’m considered a ‘JOB’ (‘Workman’ follower). Hahaha. I couldn’t watch this episode because I was busy, but my member told me about it, so I watched it, and bam!!! My name was right on there! Haha. Thank you for always making me laugh with great content, and I will continue to support you. Thank you so much for messaging me, and Happy New Year!”
Jang Sung Kyu replied, “Oh my god… I’m touched. As someone who watched ‘Chicken Noodle Soup‘ music video more than ten times, this message makes me cry. Thank you so much for touching my heart this way. I’d like to post these messages, but that’s not possible, right?! I know it’s impolite, but I can’t help but ask you. Human greed is like that… Thank you once again, and I hope you will stay healthy and continue to be the pride of the world for a long, long time!”
J-Hope cheerfully responded, “Sure thing, hyungnim! Go ahead and comfortably post them! I’m always rooting for you! And thank you so much for watching my music video!”
View this post on Instagram
Source (1)
Comments